Favourite Tires

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, zombie, Andrew

User avatar
de Bounce
Racing Driver
Posts: 1091
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:19 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Northern Burbs - Melbourne

Favourite Tires

Postby de Bounce » Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:11 am

Is the problem that we are not comparing apples with apples with the RE001's
ArJuna wrote:Joining CB here. I have the Aussie made RE001's, same size (195/50/15) and their shocking in the wet, even a set of R888's with 20% tread left do better.

From what I have established from the various threads in this forum, the Aussie RE001's are crap and the Jap ones are great.

Is this the same in the wet.

To confuse us more, my tyre fitter claims he has received both Aussie and Jap manufactured versions in the same size.

Add this revelation taken from here
Charlie Brown wrote:Yes the Bridgestone’s RE001 only have an 'outside' and are unidirectional, which may be why they are so skittish in the wet as on one side of the car they channel the water away from the tyre while the other side channels to the centre of the tyre. :shock: :?: Strange but true.


My opinion, I have the Jap 205/45x16 on a stock NB8B and they appear OK in the wet. I have not pushed or found their limit (yet) :oops: .
They are heaps better than the Ventus SP Sports K104 (on a second set of rims) which will spin and slide at much lower speeds/throttle inputs.
2011 NC2 PRHT SE in Dolphin Grey
2001 NB8B in Crystal Blue - Sold :(
Motorkhana Video

Sailor
Racing Driver
Posts: 1064
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:49 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Southie...NOT from " the Shire " :/.

Favourite Tires

Postby Sailor » Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:47 am

I put a set of Maxxis MAZ1 in a 205/45/17 on my NC when the PP2s that I wanted were not available in Oz last month.
They are absolutely one of the best tyres I've dríven on!
Quiet for a start, superb grip in the wet and dry with a very progressive feel when on their limit.
I run 32PSI all round.
I'll be very interested to see how long they last and whether they harden up after a while, but hey, realistically, how can what is considered a good performance tyre like the PP2 last 40,000k.
Rob


05 NCLE, Cosworth SC,PF01,Ohlins,Selby,GWR exh
"We're only given a tiny spark of madness.We mustn't lose it"(Robin Williams)

User avatar
PUR157
Racing Driver
Posts: 967
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:26 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Sydney, Capital of Australia
Contact:

Favourite Tires

Postby PUR157 » Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:57 pm

FWIW I had a look at the Bridgestone website re: Adrenalins, some sizes are aussie made, some aren't

Take a look...
http://www.bridgestone.com.au/tyres/treads/Adrenalin.aspx

Click on the "Sizes for this Pattern"

I'm so lost as to what tyres I need next... thank goodness I don't drive that much...
Oneness of Man and Machine
Image

NMX516
Speed Racer
Posts: 2057
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:05 pm
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Brisbane

Favourite Tires

Postby NMX516 » Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:41 pm

From what I have established from the various threads in this forum, the Aussie RE001's are crap and the Jap ones are great.


And that my friends is another reason why I will never buy Bridgestone again. How can they make the same model tyre for all intents and purposes, to the same spec, but have two completely different results??!! I pity the poor person who buys a set of RE001's and ends up with a mix of Aus made Friday arvo specials and Jap made ones. :roll:

Image
Pain is temporary, quitting lasts forever.

User avatar
jerrah
Racing Driver
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:54 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Favourite Tires

Postby jerrah » Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:46 am

I didn't think you'd be allowed to run rims more than 2 inches larger than standard for the NA?
1991 MX5

User avatar
Guran
Speed Racer
Posts: 3754
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:42 pm
Vehicle: ND - 1.5
Location: Albion Park NSW
Contact:

Favourite Tires

Postby Guran » Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:56 am

I've got Adrenalins on my NA6 and at the wet Wakefield track day last month, they had virtually no grip in the rear at the start of the day. Here's the proof:



Those first three spins were from my "out lap" in the first session. OK, the first two were probably caused by getting on the throttle too hard, but the third one (exiting the fishhook) was relatively unprovoked. After returning to the pits, I found my tyre pressures were down at around 36psi, and increased them to 40psi. I had far fewer problems after that. I have lots of camber on the rears (about 2 degrees was the most I could get with the stock set-up) and combined with low pressures on a wet track, seems to create very little grip especially on left-hand corners (due to the orientation of the tread pattern on the driver's side). In the dry, I have absolutely no complaints about Adrenalins.

Would I buy Adrenalins again? Yes. They are excellent in the dry, good in the wet with a normal wheel alignment (our Volvo has Adrenalins too - no problems with wet grip), reasonably cheap if you shop around, and being Australian made (most sizes) I much prefer to keep a bit more of my money in this country.
Standard 2006 NC - YouTube
WP 1:11.89 | SMP-S 1:05.90 GP 1:54.93 N 1:18.09 L 2:22.49 | PW 1:02.52
PI 2:00.55 | W-S 1:12.44 W-L 1:43.36 | SR 1:33.25

stevesports
Racing Driver
Posts: 740
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:02 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

Favourite Tires

Postby stevesports » Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:55 am

maybe due to lack of heat in the tyres? I remember the outer edge of the tyre is more like a semi-slick, so it might require a bit of heat to get the grip up.

in any case, my fav is my current tyre. Advan Neova AD07's. Great when warmed up, but a bit rubbishy in the cold. Only disadvantage is that it wears quickly. It is also a superseded tyre, replaced with the AD08's which are apparently much better.

Sailor
Racing Driver
Posts: 1064
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:49 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Southie...NOT from " the Shire " :/.

Favourite Tires

Postby Sailor » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:32 am

Maybe you should get a set of slicks for wet days.... :lol:
Rob


05 NCLE, Cosworth SC,PF01,Ohlins,Selby,GWR exh
"We're only given a tiny spark of madness.We mustn't lose it"(Robin Williams)

rascal
Racing Driver
Posts: 1784
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:39 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: FarSE Melbourne

Favourite Tires

Postby rascal » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:44 am

dorbar wrote:I just checked, and you're right................ so any views on 15's?


Are you going to be using these tyres on the road as well?
imo, try to keep a spare set for track and go for dedicated track tyres such as semi slicks, rather than top end road tyres.

Semi slicks are noisy as, and dont last 5 mins on the road, so I wouldnt recommend them for the road, but the difference between even the best road tyres and a set of semi slicks on the track is night and day... (I picked up 3 secs a lap alone at PI moving from Falken RT615 to Yoko A048s)

My personal vote is Toyo R888s in 205/50/15.
Thats what I run on my NB and I managed to break the vic club record for my class at PI by over a second so that says something about their worth..

my 2c.

User avatar
StanTheMan
Forum legend
Posts: 6824
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Balgowlah

Favourite Tires

Postby StanTheMan » Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:15 pm

jerrah wrote:I didn't think you'd be allowed to run rims more than 2 inches larger than standard for the NA?



I think you'll find that a total myth or a view left back in the late 80's :mrgreen: ADR did have a specific rule on that but that has been superseeded
were also talking NSW in this case. Unless of course it is a cams regulation. I'm not familiar with cams reg's.


but apart from that 15" will give you much bigger choice in tyres and cheaper. But thats another story. 16" are fine on an NA6/8 on nsw roads
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6

JMather
Driver
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:58 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Favourite Tires

Postby JMather » Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:03 am

Just got a set of toyo proxies R1-R 's on recomendation by friends. And my word thay are good! I may be *wrong* and have a a lot to learn or what ever but these tyres were fantastic! And not too expencive. Mind you they also weren't cheap. :|
I would recomend them to anyone who's car is their daily and track car.
Last edited by JMather on Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dorifta
Fast Driver
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:03 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

Favourite Tires

Postby dorifta » Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:13 am

Guran wrote:I've got Adrenalins on my NA6 and at the wet Wakefield track day last month, they had virtually no grip in the rear at the start of the day. Here's the proof:



Those first three spins were from my "out lap" in the first session. OK, the first two were probably caused by getting on the throttle too hard, but the third one (exiting the fishhook) was relatively unprovoked. After returning to the pits, I found my tyre pressures were down at around 36psi, and increased them to 40psi. I had far fewer problems after that. I have lots of camber on the rears (about 2 degrees was the most I could get with the stock set-up) and combined with low pressures on a wet track, seems to create very little grip especially on left-hand corners (due to the orientation of the tread pattern on the driver's side). In the dry, I have absolutely no complaints about Adrenalins.

Would I buy Adrenalins again? Yes. They are excellent in the dry, good in the wet with a normal wheel alignment (our Volvo has Adrenalins too - no problems with wet grip), reasonably cheap if you shop around, and being Australian made (most sizes) I much prefer to keep a bit more of my money in this country.


I used to run Adrenalins in the 32 (drift car), and I'd say they had fairly decent grip in the wet.

Don't mean to be rude (I have only owned my NB for less then a week now, haven't really pushed as hard as you have) but it looks like all your spin outs where due to driver error - wrong racing line (tyres are out in a wet line) and to need to be a little smoother on the turn in (avoid the ripple strip)!

And 40psi is wayyyy to much for the wet, I run 36/38 (dry) and 32/34(wet) on a 1300kg skyline with 8/6kg spring rates!

Try run around 32psi all over and see if there's an improvement.

-eMz
get busy living or get busy dying

Steve - Toyo Tyres
Driver
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:01 am

Favourite Tires

Postby Steve - Toyo Tyres » Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:51 am

jerrah wrote:I didn't think you'd be allowed to run rims more than 2 inches larger than standard for the NA?


NSW and most other states allow variance of + or - 15mm in overall diameter compared to the tyre sizes listed on the tyre placard. Where the wheel / tyre combination meets these regs it is legal. Replacement tyres must also have a load index that is at least the minimum stated on the tyre placard.

User avatar
Charlie Brown
Speed Racer
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney, Just out of Dragon Territory over the bridge in the "Shire"
Contact:

Favourite Tires

Postby Charlie Brown » Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:55 pm

manga_blue wrote:I simply cannot understand this at all, Phil. I've got RE001s on 2 very different cars, although both using 195/50x15s, and they stick beautifully in the wet. I'm wondering if there was something very wrong with whatever you had them on.


Sorry missed this one earlier.

The RE001s are currently on my NC and are the Aussie made 215x45x17’s.

My route to work has been the same for the last 4 years, so I have been able to comparing them in the wet on the same piece of inclined road and through some “interesting” corners many times. The RE001s have trouble getting grip from a standing start. The T1-Rs suffered less but still lost grip as the tread wore. The PP1’s had more grip than the T1-Rs but lost it also as they neared the end of their life but at least I could move off with other traffic with both the T1-R’s and the PP1’s.
It gets embarrassing when granny in a Camry on hard tyres besides you moves off without any trouble and you sit there feathering the throttle at 2,000rpm trying to get some grip. Then there’s the corners where at normal wet weather cornering speeds you run the risk of facing the other direction on the wrong side of the road.

dorifta wrote:
Don't mean to be rude (I have only owned my NB for less then a week now, haven't really pushed as hard as you have) but it looks like all your spin outs where due to driver error - wrong racing line (tyres are out in a wet line) and to need to be a little smoother on the turn in (avoid the ripple strip)!

And 40psi is wayyyy to much for the wet, I run 36/38 (dry) and 32/34(wet) on a 1300kg skyline with 8/6kg spring rates!

Try run around 32psi all over and see if there's an improvement.

-eMz


Wet weather you should run more pressure that dry as it keeps the groves in the tyre open, decrease the contact patch size while increasing the pressure per square cm on the road thus reducing aqua planning and slippage.
Image

Wakefield 1:09.13 Eastern Creek GP 1:50.198 Ext 2:17.538 Sth 1:02.9003
Phillip Is 1:58.50 Winton Short 1:10.7 Lakeside 1:05.7711 MDTC 45.20

JMather
Driver
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:58 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Favourite Tires

Postby JMather » Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:22 pm

THE REAL BORIS wrote:OEM Toyo Trampions, followed by a set of Goodyear F1's, followed by Dunlop Sport MAXX and now (the best to date) Continental Contact 3's.



ive got Goodyear F1's on the rear and i was impressed with just peformance in mind but not no more. the compound it too hard. good wear but i felt like the worked better with higher psi the what most people would use. about 38 to 40 was good. mabey im crazy.


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests