stevesports wrote:bruce wrote:Quicksilver wrote:Just out of interest, the NB8A does not have ABS braking. So do we want brakes that will lock up the wheels into a skid or do we compensate lack of ABS by having slightly weaker pads to keep the wheels rotating which theoretically should stop better and with more control than wheels that are skidding?
ABS will lock the wheels momentarily and then release them repeatedly.
The purpose of ABS is to reduce braking distances.
Using poor pads will increase braking distances.
You want good pads to get to the point just before locking up=shortest stopping distance.
Thus poor pads are not a poor-mans ABS system. You will just sail straight through that intersection to your death.
i have always thought the purpose of ABS is to prevent your wheels from locking up, therefore in an emergency situation where you just mash teh brake pedal, you can still steer the car.
Of course, subsequent to this is that compared to braking via locked wheels, braking distances will drop.
From demonstrated tests, ABS on a wet surface will both stop you in a shorter distance AND give you steering control. It does this by very rapidly applying and releasing your brakes thereby allowing the tread on your tyre to do their job of diplacing water. If the wheel stops rotating, the tread is far less effective and the wheel will aquaplane and the car literally floats on top of the water - no braking power whatsoever.
Hence my original suggestion that without ABS on the NA and NB8A models, high performance brake pads would grab the disc resulting in the wheel not rotating and THEN, Bruce, you will sail straight through the intersection, yadda, yadda, .....!
Obviously, I am not advocating 'weak' or 'soft' pads, just not upgrading from the originals for cars without ABS.
If I'm wrong, just tell me why and we will all know.