Richee wrote:Okibi wrote:Personally i'd recommend against 17" wheels, i'd go 15" or 16" if you want something bigger to fill the wheel arch.
Call me a goose and bitch slap me if Im wrong .... but if you put bigger wheels on but lower the profile of the tyre as you should then wont the "wheel arch gap" remain pretty much the same

Ya goose *BIATCH SLAP*
(sorry mate, couldn't resist)
You aren't wrong per se its just that the 17" combo WILL be slightly larger than the stock combo
stock=185/60 X 14 (22.7" diameter)
new= 204/40 X 17 (23.5" diameter)
so the 17 combo will appear slightly larger but it will also be accentuated by the stock ride height of the car.
If you do go 17's then I would suggest lowering your car to maximise the visual impact.
And it is visual impact you are after if you do go 17's
Most people here would strongly suggest
against anything larger than 16's on a NA. And their logic is entirely valid.
However, I (and meanmx) think there is nothing that seriously wrong with 17's or even 18's if carried out sensibly (Dino's old car is a case in point).
I had 16's originally on my car and my new 17 combo feels/steers and rides much better.
Could be that my new wheels are lighter or perhaps a better tyre is fitted. dunno.
In any case, i think it looks
sh*t hot-and thats what matters to me. I don't track event my car so I am not fazed by perceived issues.
DISADVANTAGES
1. Possibly illegal (3 inches over stock wheel diameter) you need to suss this out. could be an insurance sticking point too.
2. if offset is wrong may lead to excessive wear on bushes et al
3. may need lipping of front guard if you lower the car-no big deal but be aware of it.
4. will stuff up handling if you get a HEAVY (read chrome style) wheel.
anyway, these are my opinions. I say go for it. 17's look mad.
oh, this site
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html is the bomb for calculating wheel sizes.
oh, and did I mention 17's look awesome??

*flame suit on*
